When Nepal can be a Hindu Nation then Why India Can not be a Hindu Rashtra ; With Malice Towards None !

All this happened so fast, in last few years that - Twitter, FB and Whats app have turned into Universities, churning out students in millions if not billions.

 

And if at all there are any gaps left in learning The students of these UNIVERSITIES quickly fill it up through Google, little realising that Google provides only INFORMATION and in order to convert that into KNOWLEDGE they need to carry out an ANALYSIS of the INFORMATION.

 

But who has the time to do that ANALYSIS Because for that ANALYSIS One has to read the Books and to read the Books one has to spare some TIME But in this world of - INSTANT NOODLES and 30 mins PIZZA who will spare a day or so to read a Book.

 

As a result unknowingly or Knowingly many of us have either become Charlatans, acquiring DILETTANTISH Attitude and are raising issues without the complete Knowledge of the subject .

 

So, now on, I will make an endeavor to take on this PROPAGANDA carried out through these Universities( WHATS APP, FB etc) so that WE if not STOP producing CHARLATANS but atleast reduce their NUMBERS.

 

The First one from WHATS APP university that I am taking on is ;

 

If Nepal can be a Hindu Nation Why cann't India be a Hindu Rashtra ?.

 

Nepal was a Hindu Kingdom when it was being Ruled by the King but after the King was ousted the New Constitution that came in 2015 defined Nepal as ; an independent, indivisible, sovereign, SECULAR, inclusive democratic, socialism-oriented, federal democratic ,republican state.

I have specially written SECULAR in Bold Capitals and This definition is enshrined as ARTICLE 4 of their Constitution.

 

In mediaeval or in ancient times all we had were ; KINGDOMS managed by Kings and QUEENS. This was in all parts of the world ; ROMAN EMPIRE, BRITISH EMPIRE, OTTOMAN EMPIRE, MARATHA EMPIRE, MUGHAL KINGDOM, MAURAYAN EMPIRE, and many small kingdoms.

 

These Kings and Queens kept fighting with each other to expand their Kingdoms and so the borders kept changing. For instance ENGLAND was part of Roman Empire for more than 300 years and France was part of ROMAN empire for almost 400 years.

 

So after a 30 years war in which- Religion was also a cause, A Treaty was signed in 1648 by warring Kingdoms called as TREATY OF WESTPHALIA which is regarded as a milestone in the development toward tolerance and secularization and creation of a NATION STATE SYSTEM.

 

Thats how gradually the Nation state system came about , for definition and what are its essential elements - one can now refer to Google.

On the lighter side , to understand the difference between the two ; Kingdom and Nation State - WHAT DID JHANSI KI RANI say ;

MAI APNI JHANSI NAHIN DOONGI YAA MEY APNA BHARAT NAHIN DOONGI?

 

So, stop mixing the Two - a KINGDOM with a NATION STATE. When we stop mixing we would then realise that ;

WHY DID MAHARAJA RANJIT SINGH signed a treaty with British and did not help Yeshwantrao Holkar I in his fight against British ,

Why did Yeshwantrao Holkar- I shied away from helping Scindia and Gaekwad in their fight against British?

Why Gorkhas and Sikhs supported the British in 1857 to supress the Mutiny or the Rebellion because it was largely supported by the Marathas?

Why did Maratahas taxed or collected Chauth from Rajput Kings ?

 

They were Kingdoms and Not Nation States.

Do we want to now go back and create a Kingdom ? 

MAHARAJ KI JAI HO !