क्या ही शानदार नारा है—"बटेंगे तो कटेंगे"जो भारत को 2047 तक एक विकसित राष्ट्र बनाने की प्रेरणा देता है। लेकिन अगर विभिन्न राज्यों में मौजूदा सांप्रदायिक हालातों को देखा जाए और चुनाव जीतने के लिए जनलुभावन उपायों को ही एकमात्र मंत्र मान लिया जाए, और अगर लाखों समर्थकों के लिए चुनाव जीतना ही अंतिम उद्देश्य बन जाए, तो आने वाले समय में हालात चिंताजनक हो सकते हैं।

यह हैरानी की बात नहीं होगी अगर 2027 तक भारत मणिपुर जैसे संकटों का सामना करता दिखे। आज भले ही कई लोग इसे गंभीरता से लें, लेकिन इतिहास गवाह है कि हम अकसर विभाजनकारी विचारधाराओं के परिणामों को समय रहते नहीं समझ पाते।

  • जब हिटलर ने नफरत फैलाई, तब कम ही लोग आने वाले विनाश की कल्पना कर पाए।
  • जब इंदिरा गांधी ने राजनीतिक लाभ के लिए भिंडरावाले को बढ़ावा दिया, तब दरारें पड़ गईं।
  • जब भिंडरावाले ने सांप्रदायिक नफरत फैलाई, तो इसके परिणाम घातक साबित हुए।
  • जब कश्मीरी कट्टरपंथियों ने अपने पंडित पड़ोसियों को धमकाया, तो इससे न केवल पंडितों को बल्कि मुसलमानों को भी दुख और कष्ट झेलना पड़ा।
  • जब जिन्ना ने धर्म के आधार पर देश का विभाजन किया, तो इससे न केवल ऐसी गहरी चोटें लगीं जो आज तक बनी हुई हैं, बल्कि इसने पाकिस्तान को धार्मिक कट्टरता और विनाश के रास्ते पर भी धकेल दिया।जब पाकिस्तान ने अपने जिहादियों को "रणनीतिक संपत्ति" कहा, तो हिंसा की विरासत बनी।
  • जब सद्दाम हुसैन ने अल्पसंख्यकों पर अत्याचार किए, तो पूरे क्षेत्र में अस्थिरता फैल गई।
  • जब मणिपुर के न्यायाधीशों ने मैतेई समुदाय को अनुसूचित जनजाति में शामिल करने का निर्देश दिया, तो अशांति भड़क उठी।
  • जब उस ऋषि ने ऋग्वेद के मंडल 10, सूक्त 90 में पुरुषसूक्त लिखा, जिसमें यह घोषणा की गई कि ब्राह्मण उनके (पुरुष, अर्थात् विश्वात्मा) मुख हैं, क्षत्रिय उनके भुजाएँ बने, वैश्य उनकी जंघाएँ, और शूद्र उनके चरणों sey utpan huye तब उन्होंने यह नहीं सोचा होगा कि यह समाज के ताने-बाने को भारी क्षति पहुँचाएगा, समाज को विभाजित कर देगा, और इसके दुष्परिणाम हजारों वर्षों तक महसूस किए जाएँगे। यहां तक कि इस विभाजन के कारण समाज अपनी स्वतंत्रता भी खो सकता है।

"बटेंगे तो कटेंगे" जैसा नारा समाज को भटकाने की जबरदस्त क्षमता रखता है। अगर हम सतर्क नहीं हुए, तो अल्पकालिक लक्ष्यों और संकीर्ण स्वार्थों की यह दौड़ हमें उस सपने से दूर कर सकती है, जिसमें हम एक शांतिपूर्ण और विकसित भारत की कल्पना करते हैं।

 

Add a comment

What a profound slogan—“Batengey to Katengey”—to rally India towards becoming a developed nation by 2047. However, if the current communal situation in various states is any indication, coupled with the rise of populist measures as the sole mantra to win elections, and with winning elections becoming the ultimate goal of millions of supporters, the future seems precarious.

It wouldn’t be surprising if whole India finds itself engulfed in crises similar to the conflict that is as of now restricted to just Manipur as early as 2027. Many may dismiss such concerns now, but history has shown us how often we fail to foresee the consequences of divisive ideologies/politics.

  • When Hitler spread hatred, none of his die hard supporters could anticipate the horrors and the destruction that would follow.
  • When Indira Gandhi nurtured Bhindranwale for political gains, the seeds of strife were sown.
  • When Bhindranwale incited communal hatred, none could foresee, what that would mean for Punjab.
  • When Kashmiri fundamentalists threatened their Pandit neighbors, they could not forsee the misery it would cause to  Muslims as well.
  • When Jinnah divided the nation on the basis of religion, it not only left scars that persist to this day but also led Pakistan on a road of religious fundamentalism and destruction.
  • When Pakistan called its jihadists "strategic assets," it created a legacy of violence.
  • When Saddam Hussein oppressed minorities, it destabilized an entire region from which Iraq has still not been able to come out.
  • When the judiciary succumbing to political pressures in Manipur directed the inclusion of Meiteis in the Scheduled Tribes list, the Learned Judges could not foresee the unrest, their Judgement would cause.
  • When that sage wrote the Purusha sukta in Rig Ved , Mandala 10 , sukt 90, announcing that The Brahmanas were His(Purusah, the Universal Being) Mouth, the Kshatriyas became His Arms, The Vaishyas were His Thighs, and the Shudras were assigned to His Feet. Little he foresaw that this will cause immense damage to the social fabric and divide the society and its repercussions will be felt even after thousands of years, to an extent that the society may even lose its freedom. No amount of justification can undo the damage now.

The slogan “Batengey to Katengey” carries a similar dangerous potential to lead society astray, fostering divisions instead of unity. If we are not vigilant, the pursuit of short-term goals and narrow interests may push us further away from the vision of a harmonious and developed India.

Add a comment

 

 

Almost every channel and newspaper, including social media, while analyzing the outcome of the recently concluded elections in which Mr. Modi narrowly missed a majority and faced a setback in UP, particularly Ayodhya, held Dalits responsible for the setback. On social media, it was no holds barred. It highlighted the arrogance of some of our upper-caste Hindus who blamed the Dalits for this setback, as if they committed a crime by not voting for Modi.

 
This is also an indicator that neither Bapu's efforts nor the political empowerment of Dalit leaders (as envisioned by Dr. Ambedkar) have succeeded in transforming the hearts of the upper-caste Hindus. There is hardly any change of heart as far as upper-caste Hindus are concerned; perhaps they have a habit of dictating terms and issuing directions to their brothers from lower castes.
 
For thousands of years, upper-caste Hindus deprived lower-caste Hindus of the right to live a respectful and dignified life. There are well-documented records proving the ill-treatment and exploitation of lower-caste Hindus: denying them access to village wells, denying them entry into temples, following rituals like sprinkling water on paths after a Dalit had passed, and forbidding public wedding rituals, among other injustices.
 
In Travancore state, the King imposed exorbitant taxes on Dalits, particularly a tax called Mulakkaram, which was levied on Dalit women who wore clothing covering their breasts. One brave woman protested this humiliating tax by cutting off her breasts.
 
It has taken numerous Satyagrahas by Dr. Ambedkar to compel the upper caste to allow lower-caste Hindus access to water from a tank in Mumbai and entry to the Kalaram Mandir in Nasik. Before Babasaheb Ambedkar led the Nasik Kalaram temple entry movement, there had been various other temple entry movements from Dalits’ side with little success. In 1874, a failed attempt was made by untouchables in Madras state to enter Minakshi temple. In 1924, the temple entry movement was launched at Vaikom in Travancore state by Periyar. The attempt for Ambadevi temple entry Satyagraha at Amaravati started in February 1928 but could not gather much support. Another attempt was at Parvati Temple in Pune in October 1929 and continued until 1930 without much change of heart from the so-called upper castes.
 
Gandhiji’s fast unto death pressured upper-caste Hindus to open temples and wells to lower-caste Hindus. The Constitution of India eventually granted them equal rights and made discrimination a crime.
 
Despite this, the Mandal Commission report, which recommended reservations for lower castes, faced fierce opposition from the upper castes. So, the rights and reservations granted to lower-caste Hindus were achieved not through a transformation of heart, as Gandhiji envisioned, but through legislation, protests, and agitation.
 
Discrimination persists despite legislation. For instance, just a year ago in Madhya Pradesh near Mandsaur, a lower-caste police constable required police security to complete his wedding rituals because upper-caste Hindus objected to the public procession.
 
A Dalit family from Karnataka's Miyapur village in Koppal district was fined Rs 25,000 in 2021 after their two-year-old child entered a temple.
 
Those who dismiss caste-based discrimination and blame the British for creating divisions among Hindus must realize that Dalits, a significant portion of our community, only gained their rights through the Constitution after Independence.
 
The democratic institutions established under the Constitution, which enabled Dalits to vote, have ensured that Dalits have a voice. However, the upper-caste Hindus still show no remorse or guilt for their forefathers' actions and prefer to blame others for the division.
 
Recently, listening to Trevor Noah, a renowned South African comedian, I noticed that he, without fear of reprisal, mocked white people during his performance in the US, and they applauded him. He touched upon a sensitive issue in his country: discrimination against Blacks. Noah mentioned that in South Africa, the exploitation of Blacks is taught in schools and is openly condemned as harmful to society.
 
Just as we freely discuss and criticize the atrocities of Muslim invaders, it is crucial for upper-caste Hindus to openly acknowledge and educate their children about the historical injustices against Dalits. This honest confrontation with the past is essential to prevent repetition and promote true equality.
 
Until this issue of caste-based discrimination is taught to students and its adverse impact on society discussed publicly, we will continue to produce citizens who boast of their caste chauvinism and are unaware of the past injustices. They should be able to appreciate why Dalits are apprehensive about any changes to the Constitution, which arises from the fact that the rights they enjoy today have come after a long and arduous struggle and through the Constitution and not through any change of heart of the upper-caste Hindus.
 
The upper-caste Hindus need to show empathy instead of cursing and dismissing the discrimination and ill-treatment that Dalits faced, as the Dalits cannot afford to sacrifice their hard-earned freedom.
 
Let's discuss it and accept that we did wrong and should emerge stronger than ever.
Add a comment

 

 We are facing an environmental crisis and it needs no emphasis that if something not done immediately, we may cause an irreparable damage to the planet’s environment, rather some scientists claim that we have already done that damage.

However, even if we have already caused that damage at least, we should not further that damage, which may imperil our own survival.

Unfortunately, the people think that the govts need to save the environment and the govt thinks that the rich countries need to compensate them and offer them technology to do the same.

Second, in the guise of saving environment our Hard earned tax payers money is being spent in scoring brownie points with no accountability by these scoundrel politicians.

In 2016, UP Govt planted more than five crore trees in a single day at more than 6,000 locations across the state of Uttar Pradesh.

In 2017, In a bid to create a Guinness World Record, the Madhya Pradesh government carried out a drive to plant six crore saplings in 12-hours along the banks of river Narmada.

I am sure, even those who planted the trees will not be able to account for them as no official assessment of the plantation drive has been conducted so far. An Activist Vinayak Parihar alleged that an audit of the plantation has proved that not even one crore saplings have survived because the plantation was carried out in a hurried manner. 

Five Hindu 'religious leaders' were given the rank of minister of state in MP after they threatened to expose the plantation scam.  One among them was Computer Baba, who had threatened agitation was also given the plum post , and thereafter he withdrew his agitation and gave Govt a clean chit.

In nutshell everyone is passing the buck and here we have spent summers at temperatures touching nearly 50 degrees Celsius, most of the rivers have shrunk into nullahs, ponds and lakes covered to build buildings, forests and agricultural land reduced to provide space to build highways, tunnels, dams, townships and as aresult millions are facing water shortages .

Many are under the impression that if you uproot a forest and keep numerous plots( one each for every son and daughter) all over the city, you can still protect the environment by planting as many trees along side the road or in your colony 

Add a comment

 

Following the signing of the Simla Agreement in the wake of a humbling defeat in 1971, Bhutto conveyed to Chief of Army Staff, Gen. Tikka Khan, the inevitability of future conflicts despite fleeting periods of peace. Bhutto's words reflected a deep-seated national confidence, and superiority he said ;

" Neither a few years of arranged peace nor the present situation can possibly permit us to ignore the reality that there must inevitably sooner or later come another war. Xxxxxx. In the remotest of our villages the humblest of our people possesses a self-confidence a ready willingness to march forward into India, a spirit the equivalent of which cannot be found on the other side. xxxxx. All this is not ancient history, it is current history and the Indian masses are just now still struggling against the legacy of superstitions, religious intolerance , caste system, regional animosities, poverty backwardness, ignorance, deceit and the unconquerable habit of submission and servility”.

J.N. Dixit, former Foreign Secretary and Security Advisor of India, echoed similar sentiments in his book "Anatomy of Flawed Inheritance." He highlighted the repeated debunking of the myth of Islamic superiority by Indian military prowess in various conflicts, spanning from 1947 to Kargil.

India's history is marked by five significant conflicts, four with Pakistan and one with China. In each confrontation with Pakistan, India emerged victorious, delivering decisive blows even in the battles where Pakistan army enjoyed considerable advantage ; tactical, equipment and numerical. For instance ; Battle of Assal Uttar, OP Hill, Dograi, HajiPir, Laungewala, etc. Similarly, against China, Indian forces displayed remarkable resilience despite all the challenges and on many occasions fought till the last man last round.

Delving further into history, India's military prowess is evident.

Throughout history, Indian warriors have valiantly defended their land.

Porus gave a tough fight to Alexander who had a comparatively easy run all through ; Egypt and Persia . Alexander’s army in 316 BC, when came against Porus, suffered good amount of casualties and so decided to return. Nehruji in his book “ Discovery of India” while explaining as to why Alexander returned wrote ; “Alexander and his soldiers after having faced a stiff resistance at the hands of the frontier king, felt that if they go further deeper into India the challenge is going to get tougher , when they face kings having bigger kingdoms and so they decided to return”.

Field Marshal Zhukov a famous Russian General of WW II had even remarked ;

“ Alexander did not win against Porus, it is like claiming that just because Napolean had reached Moscow , he had defeated Russians. Yes, Alexander reached the banks of Indus but thereafter was forcibly driven back by Porus, like Russians pushed Napoleon”.

Thereafter Chandrgupt Maurya defeated the Greek army led by Seleucius Nicator in 305 BC.

It is perhaps this reason why Greeks had a high opinion about the Indians. Mountstuart Elphinstone a renowned historian writes in his Book, The History of India “

The Greeks, , have described Indians as tall and active. Their bravery was always spoken of as characteristic; their superiority in war to other Asiatics is repeatedly asserted and appears in more ways than one. They are said to be sober, moderate, peaceable, good soldiers, good farmers, remarkable for simplicity and integrity; so reasonable as never to have recourse to a law suit; and so honest as neither to require locks to their doors nor writings to bind their agreements. Above all no Indian was ever known to tell an untruth”.

How soldierly our ancestors were.

Thereafter, Prithviraj Chauhan defeated Ghori in Battle of Tarain in 1191, Hemu had defeated Mughal army and had captured Agra and Delhi before losing to Akbar after a well fought battle, Rana Sangha and Rana Pratap gave tough fight to invaders and Pratap even regained most of his lost territory defeating Akbar’s forces, thereafter Shivaji, Bajirao Peshwa , and his generals defeated many muslim kings, the Sikhs under Guru Gobind Singh gave a horrifying time to Aurangzeb’s army and Maharaja Ranjit Singh established a Sikh empire right till Afghanistan and had his capital in Lahore, after defeating many muslim kings.

Even the British did not get their empire easily and could not rule in peace as being thought of ; Tipu Sultan, Hyder Ali’s army , Yeshwantrao Holkar I , and many others gave British a run for the money. In battle of Bharatpur the British had suffered almost 3000 casualties and at one point had no money to fight Yeshwantrao Holkar I. In 1857 rebellion, it took the British almost a year to bring back normalcy. Thereafter, when we realised that its pointless fighting a super power on its strength, we devised a unique way of Not cooperating and disobeying their diktats, rendering the rulers ineffective, but we did not succumb, as is being depicted, by some.

Contrary to narratives of perpetual victimization, India's resilience shines through. The Roman empire was also destroyed by invaders from North, England was ruled for almost 300 years by Romans, the French were also ruled by Romans, the Chinese were humiliated by the British, the Koreans also were tormented by invading Japanese, the Jews had to leave their land, the Egyptian and Persian civilisation got vanished, leaving just the tombs and statues of their gods and kings, but on the other hand we are still there and thriving.

Conclusion

So, it is intriguing as to how a sense of inferiority persists, Instead of being proud of ourselves, we are being repeatedly told; look you have been subjugated and been suppressed always.

Who are those people who are spreading lies that we have been victimised, rendered helpless and we do not have the ability to fight.

When one probes deeper one finds that those who are spreading these lies are the same kind of people because of whom we lost wars in medieval times and lost our political freedom; They are the same people who drove the society to orthodoxy, conservatism, obscurantism and made us inflexible, unprogressive and stagnated.

Add a comment

About Us

Our journey as a modern nation statestarted in 1947 with the historic speech byPandit Jawaharlal Nehru, with 95% illiteracy, barely any industry and transport system, armed forces that were divided due to partition lacking equipment was largely in disarray, if there were guns- then the dial sights were taken away by Pakistanis, making the guns ineffective, if there were files- maps were taken way by Pakistanis, if there were battalions, half the men had gone away to Pakistan and so on.


Archived Articles

Find us at

Address : Indore, (M.P)

Mobile : +91-9981120072

Email : bharatamrising@gmail.com

Send us a message

Links

Bharatam Civilization

Politics

Geo-Politics and Security

Society

Science and Technology

  • Achievements
  • Latest

Economy

  • Achievements & Challenges
  • Latest

Art and Culture

  • Unique Features & Achievements
  • Latest

Citizens Corner